Video: Essex Fire Authority to pay £15million to Government after accounting "oversight"

Essex Fire Authority to pay £15million to Government

Essex Fire Authority to pay £15million to Government

First published in News
Last updated

ESSEX Fire Service is being forced to use all of its £15million savings to pay off a debt it did not know it owed.

An investigation has been launched after the service discovered it had to pay the huge bill to the Governement for firefighters’ injury pension payments -wiping out its entire savings.

It should have been paying the Government an extra £1.8million every year since 2006 but an accounting “oversight” meant it had instead been paying just £120,000.

Last week, the Department for Communities Local Government flagged up the huge debt to Essex County Fire and Rescue Service (ECFRS) and some other fire authoritities.

It means Essex’s fire authority will have to find a further £1.8million per year on top of its £5.9million cuts over the next few years.

It has already covered this year’s £1.8million as it had underspent.

Acting chief fire officer Adam Eckley said: “At this stage we don’t believe it will impact on the delivery of front line services, we believe that the entire liability can be covered by the authorities existing level of reserves.

“Those reserves were held for the authority to manage any in-year shocks, financial shocks that were presented and that is exactly how they will be used on this occassion.

“The Fire Authority’s accounts have been audited annually by independent auditors appointed by the Audit Commission but until now, the discrepancy was missed.

“Even the Department for Communities and Local Government, who receive an annual return from all UK fire and rescue services failed to pick up on the liability.

“Because of our prudent financial management over the last few years we have built up significant reserves and we are in a healthy financial position and able to wipe out this debt immediately.

“This is a significant burden but unlike other fire and rescue services that will likely face a similar financial challenge, the Fire Authority has the cash to pay while remaining financially sound.”

No one has resigned or been sacked over the mistake but Kent Fire Service will conduct and independent investigation.

Mr Eckley added: “While the Treasurer and Finance Director is clearly accountable, we are not looking for any scapegoats.

“This was a genuine oversight by a number of parties and was brought to the Fire Authority’s attention as soon as it was discovered.”

Riccardo La Torre, Essex Chairman of the Fire Brigade Union, said they had been kept in the dark about the debt until it was announced yesterday and was waiting for more details.

He said: “It is just quite concering for a number of reasons, number one that the mistake happened in the first place and more importantly what it is now going to mean for our members.

“With the cuts they were already looking at losing 170 firefighters jobs when it was £5.9million so now that its £7.7million I am sure they will revisit that strategy.”

He also claimed the FBU had been reassured the reserves were to safeguard against redundancies.

Comments (7)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

4:44pm Tue 12 Aug 14

SOMETHING2SAY says...

Erm....same week we hear 1 in 5 firemen to go from Colchester station. Someones made a massive error....and need to be held to account....theres no smoke without fire !
Erm....same week we hear 1 in 5 firemen to go from Colchester station. Someones made a massive error....and need to be held to account....theres no smoke without fire ! SOMETHING2SAY
  • Score: 5

4:52pm Tue 12 Aug 14

Ontheball says...

The incompetents that make up the fire authority are obviously not fit for purpose. Plenty of posturing and cutting of front line services, but unable to get a grip of a major financial situation.

Who are these people accountable to?
The incompetents that make up the fire authority are obviously not fit for purpose. Plenty of posturing and cutting of front line services, but unable to get a grip of a major financial situation. Who are these people accountable to? Ontheball
  • Score: 3

5:36pm Tue 12 Aug 14

sesibollox says...

Proof Karma works, for going on all those strikes....
Proof Karma works, for going on all those strikes.... sesibollox
  • Score: -10

9:14pm Tue 12 Aug 14

Fab man says...

So I suppose the Council Tax is going up then to cover this!
So I suppose the Council Tax is going up then to cover this! Fab man
  • Score: -1

10:31pm Tue 12 Aug 14

TorreyCanyon says...

What an absolute catabolic shambles of an epidemic proportion.
Past Chief Officers should be held to question here surely ?
What an absolute catabolic shambles of an epidemic proportion. Past Chief Officers should be held to question here surely ? TorreyCanyon
  • Score: 1

11:23pm Tue 12 Aug 14

emcee says...

Quote acting chief fire officer Adam Eckley: "No one has resigned or been sacked over the mistake... While the Treasurer and Finance Director is clearly accountable, we are not looking for any scapegoats. "
-
This is not a "scapegoat" situation. If the Finance Director IS responsible for this monumental ****-up then that person should go, pure and simple.
Why do tax funded departments/organisa
tions always find it so hard to sack people who are responsible for any mess made under their watch but more than happy to do plenty of backslapping?
The whole "big boys club" culture is a travesty.
Quote acting chief fire officer Adam Eckley: "No one has resigned or been sacked over the mistake... While the Treasurer and Finance Director is clearly accountable, we are not looking for any scapegoats. " - This is not a "scapegoat" situation. If the Finance Director IS responsible for this monumental ****-up then that person should go, pure and simple. Why do tax funded departments/organisa tions always find it so hard to sack people who are responsible for any mess made under their watch but more than happy to do plenty of backslapping? The whole "big boys club" culture is a travesty. emcee
  • Score: -1

7:57am Wed 13 Aug 14

hughie-s says...

If the accounts have been signed off by the auditors, appointed by the Audit Commission not the council, is there not a case to make a claim against both of them for negligence?
If the accounts have been signed off by the auditors, appointed by the Audit Commission not the council, is there not a case to make a claim against both of them for negligence? hughie-s
  • Score: 1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree