At a cost of £15 million and 10 years in the planning, you’d be forgiven for thinking that this new facility would be an appealing healthcare option if you had the ­inclination and the wherewithal to go private. But you’d only be welcome if you were a cat, a dog or a gerbil – any type of small animal, in fact. Definitely no humans, though.

The Small Animal Hospital, on the site of Glasgow University’s Vet School in Bearsden, East Dunbartonshire, opened its doors last week to much fanfare. The facility will host 11,000 visits from across the UK and improve the teaching of 600 veterinary students. With a sloping grass roof – presumably for back-up if the hamsters run out of nosh – and a central glass atrium providing natural light, the hospital leads the way in design as well as science. To say that this facility has pedigree would be something of an understatement.

But there have been detractors. Humans, being inherently gifted in the power of speech, have tongue-wagged where our furry friends can only tail-wag and drool. Some say our pets don’t deserve such an opportunity for health and wellbeing. Humans have to wait months for a scan, whereas Felix can get a cat scan at the drop of Dr Seuss’s hat. How unfair is that?

Well, Felix perhaps has a devoted owner willing to cough up for cat flu, or at least pay the premiums for decent pet insurance. You see, there’s no NHS for animals. The People’s Dispensary for Sick Animals, supported by charitable donations, does an extremely important job in providing treatment and help for pet-owners who can’t afford expensive vet bills or insurance, ensuring that having a four-legged friend is not exclusive to the better off. The Scottish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals works tirelessly to help pets that are down on their luck become healthy and have a chance of a good home, as does the Dogs Trust.

Humans, on the other hand, are rather used to having the NHS a mere dog’s whistle away. Brilliant – but no underwater treadmill. I fear treatment-envy is creeping in. It is, however, plain barking to suggest that patients at the new animal hospital are being treated at the expense of humans and that money is being diverted from the NHS.

Professor Stuart Reid, dean of the faculty of veterinary medicine, acknowledged that the services on offer at the new hospital might seem decadent to non-animal lovers, but added that a society can be judged by how well it treats its animals. The £5m in donations raised for the new hospital shows that compassion still warms the public heart.

Reid said: “There is no NHS for animals and pet-owners pay for this level of treatment because they care for their animals. I can understand that it may seem over-the-top for someone who is not interested in animals but we don’t distinguish between humans and animals; they are all living beings.”

It’s actually a little more fundamental than that. If we choose to have a pet, then that animal is our responsibility. It’s the human that’s in control. That’s why our poor, dumb friends – if only they could speak – are at our mercy. It leaves them open to cruelty of unspeakable degrees. But it also means – one would hope in the majority of cases – that owners will take it upon themselves to see that their needs are met, no matter the cost.

Society accepts that some people choose to spend thousands on flash cars, insuring them at hefty premiums, since it makes them feel good. Why criticise a dog-owner for spending a fortune on a faithful friend?

The new animal hospital, however, has more far-reaching implications than healing sick pets. The training and research – much of which helps in the understanding and treatment of human diseases and conditions – will be of a calibre to lead the world.

Reid said: “I was flying back to Scotland from London and I saw the Small Animal Hospital from the window of the plane; it looked like a jewel shining out of Bearsden.”

Surely it should be a source of pride that such a jewel gleams in a Scottish crown.